Ex Parte Fahy - Page 13


             Appeal No. 2006-0148                                                             Page 13                
             Application No. 09/933,309                                                                              

             significant improvement of cellular immune function.  See, e.g., the abstract.                          
             McCormick did not, however, conclude that growth hormone treatment had no effect on                     
             thymus function.  Rather, McCormick stated that                                                         
                    [o]ur results would seem to indicate that the rejuvenation of the senescent                      
                    cellular immune response is not achieved as quickly as the rejuvenation of                       
                    the thymus gland.  The thymus regained much of its normal young                                  
                    morphology after 8 weeks of growth hormone treatment but cellular                                
                    immune function did not recover as quickly.  This can be explained in                            
                    either of two ways.  First, it may be due to the time lag in the seeding of                      
                    the peripheral lymphoid organs with newly matured and normal functioning                         
                    thymocytes from the rejuvenated thymus.  Alternatively, it may be that the                       
                    thymus factors responsible for maintaining the vigor of the cellular immune                      
                    response have not been present for a long enough period of time to                               
                    restore peripheral lymphocytes to normal functioning levels.                                     
             Paragraph bridging pages 23 and 24.                                                                     
                    Thus, while McCormick observed no increase in thymus function during the time                    
             period of the disclosed experiment, the researchers reported that they expected                         
             increased thymus function because of “the rejuvenation of the thymus gland.”                            
             McCormick suggests that improved function was expected, even though it was not                          
             observed as quickly as improved morphology.                                                             
                    None of the results reported by McCormick directly contradict the conclusions                    
             reached by Goff and the Fahy declaration – that growth hormone treatment improves                       
             thymus function.  As discussed above, the results reported by Goff and in the Fahy                      
             declaration reinforce each other and therefore are entitled to more weight collectively                 
             than McCormick’s negative results (which even McCormick tries to explain away).  We                     
             find that the preponderance of the evidence in the record favors Appellant’s position that              
             growth hormone treatment is likely to produce an increase in thymus function.                           







Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007