Appeal No. 2006-0165
Application 10/292,721
requirements of the appellant’s claims would have been fairly
suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art by the applied
references as discussed above.
Conclusion
For the above reasons we are not convinced of reversible
error in the examiner’s rejections. Accordingly, we affirm those
rejections.
DECISION
The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claim 1 over Suarez
in view of Tamam, claims 2 and 3 over Suarez in view of Fan,
claims 5-9 over Suarez in view of Fan and Tamam, and claim 10
over Suarez, are affirmed.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007