The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MING NIEN ____________ Appeal No. 2006-0172 Application No. 10/460,478 ____________ HEARD: February 22, 2006 ____________ Before FRANKFORT, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 9 and 13 through 15. As noted on page 2 of the brief, the rejection of claim 12 is “not being appealed.” Claims 10 and 11, the only other claims remaining in the application, stand allowed. Appellant’s invention is directed to a venetian type blind window covering having fabric slats (22) and light screening fabric flaps (26) attached to and suspended from one or both edges of the slats to form a light screening face at one of the front and backPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007