The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte FRANZ-JOSEF CARDUCK, THEO FLECKENSTEIN, GERD GOEBEL and ROLAND HOURTICOLON _____________ Appeal No. 2006-0219 Application No. 09/855,002 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KIMLIN, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-14 and 16-30. Claims 1 and 18 are illustrative: 1. A liquid distributor, said distributor being in the form of a channel distributor comprising a drainage outlet in the form of a drainage pipe having a cross- section, at the upper end of the drainage pipe, which tapers downward in the shape of a nozzle, wherein the inner wall of the nozzle is comprised of a material resistant to the adherence of solids which would block the flow of liquid through the outlet. 18. A liquid distributor having a tapering drainage pipe in the shape of a nozzle.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007