The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAYMOND SELTZER,
DAVID DEVORE, GLEN T. CUNKLE, CYRIL HEITNER,
JOHN A. SCHMIDT, PETER F. MCGARRY,
JEAN-PIERRE WOLF and RANDALL B. NELSON
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0231
Application No. 09/234,253
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 11,
35 to 40 and 44. Claims 12 to 34 stand withdrawn from consideration. (Brief, p. 2).
The Examiner has indicated that the subject matter of claim 45 is allowable. (Answer,
p. 2). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007