Ex Parte SELTZER et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2006-0231                                                                       Παγε 2                  
               Application No. 09/234,253                                                                                         



                BACKGROUND                                                                                                        
                      The present invention relates to chemical pulp or paper compositions.  According                            
               to Appellants, the pulp or paper compositions have reduced loss of brightness and                                  
               enhanced resistance to yellowing by virtue of the composition comprising certain                                   
               hindered amine derivatives.  (Brief, p. 3).  Representative claim 44, as presented in                              
               Appellants’ Brief, is reproduced below:                                                                            
                      44.  A composition having reduced loss of brightness and enhanced                                           
                      resistance to yellowing which comprises                                                                     
                      (a) a pulp or paper, and                                                                                    
                      (b) an effective stabilizing amount of tris(N,N-                                                            
                      diethylhydroxylammonium) citrate.                                                                           
                      The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting the appealed claims:                           
               SELTZER et al. (Seltzer)  5,051,511    Sept. 24, 1991                                                              
               RODGERS et al. (Rodgers) 5,459,222   Oct.  17, 19951                                                               

                      Claims 1 to 11, 35 to 40 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as                                    
               unpatentable over the combination of Seltzer and Rodgers.  (Answer, pp. 3-4).  We                                  
               affirm the rejection.                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                 
                      1  The date provided for this reference in the Examiner’s Answer, page 2, is incorrect.                     










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007