The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JULIAN HARBU
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0320
Application No. 10/293,833
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, BAHR, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 10 through 27, all of the claims remaining
in the application. Claims 1 through 9 have been canceled.1
Appellant’s invention relates to a non-metallic gas valve
assembly for a shock absorber and to a shock absorber assembly
including such a non-metallic valve assembly. Independent claims
1 Claims 10, 14, 20, 23 and 26 were amended subsequent to
the final rejection in a paper filed concurrently with the brief
on March 2, 2005.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007