The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MATTHEW W. DUNN and DANIEL J. SHOFF ___________ Appeal No. 2006-0360 Application No. 10/388,691 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, BARRETT, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 25-30. The invention pertains to video-on-demand (VOD) type systems, but, more than a VOD system, wherein a viewer can order videoPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007