Ex Parte Chickles et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                            
            not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the                           
            Board.                                                                                    


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                                                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                                                                                     
                      Ex parte JUSTIN CHICKLES and RAGHAVENDRA GURURAJ                                
                                                                                                     
                                       Appeal No. 2006-0361                                           
                                     Application 09/752,654                                           
                                                                                                     
                                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                                                                                     

            Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                         
            THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                            

                  Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s                           
            rejection of claims 73 through 76, 78 through 120, 122 through                            
            144 and 146 through 158, the pending claims having been twice                             
            rejected.                                                                                 












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007