Ex Parte Buschhaus et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0370                                                        
          Application 09/552,044                                                      
               The appealed claims relate to an aqueous system which                  
          includes a hydrolysis-sensitive active component (e.g.,                     
          dichlofluanid, tolylfluanid, or fluorfolpet), and one or more               
          binders having a pH#7 (e.g., alkyd resins based on vegetable oils           
          or acrylate dispersions) which stabilize the active component.              
               Appellants stipulate on page 3 of their brief that all of              
          the appealed claims stand or fall together for purposes of this             
          appeal.  Accordingly, we shall limit our consideration to claim             
          40, one of four independent claims, which reads as follows:                 
               40.  An aqueous system comprising:                                     
               (A) a component selected from the group consisting of                  
          dichlofluanid, tolylfluanid, fluorfolpet, and mixtures thereof,             
          and                                                                         
               (B) one or more binders having a pH#7 selected from the                
          group consisting of (I) alkyd resins based on vegetable oils and            
          (ii) acrylate dispersions,                                                  
               wherein the aqueous system is storage stable.                          
               The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are:              
          Eversole et al (Eversole)     3,113,399      Dec. 10, 1963                  
          Heuer et al. (Heuer)          5,972,971      Oct. 26, 1999                  
          Ludwig et al. (Ludwig)        5,990,143      Nov. 23, 1999                  
               The following rejections are before us for review:                     
               1.  Claims 40-47 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                 
          second paragraph, for alleged indefiniteness.                               
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007