Ex Parte Bryan - Page 2


               Appeal No. 2006-0381                                                                       Page 2                  
               Application No. 09/729,133                                                                                         

               activated by blue light to emit green light and thus may be used in the absence of                                 
               luciferase and in conjunction with an external light source with novelty items.”  Page 59.                         
                      “Soap bubbles are blown from water solutions or other aqueous composition                                   
               containing soap or another surfactant. . . . Such compositions, preferably those that                              
               have near neutral pH, can be combined with the components of the bioluminescence                                   
               generating systems.”  Page 113.  “[A] fluorescent protein, such as GFP, BFP [blue                                  
               fluorescent protein] or a phycobiliprotein, may be added to the bubble-making                                      
               composition and then illuminated using an external light source.  For example, bubbles                             
               containing a fluorescent protein may be produced in a room illuminated with light of an                            
               appropriate wavelength to cause the fluorescent protein to fluoresce.”  Page 114.                                  
                                                          Discussion                                                              
               1.  Claim construction                                                                                             
                      Claims 1-3, 5, and 8-14 are on appeal.  Claims 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 15-21 are also                           
               pending:  claims 9 and 11 have been objected to but not rejected, and claims 4, 6, 7,                              
               and 15-21 have been withdrawn from consideration by the examiner.  In addition, for the                            
               generic claims, the examiner required Appellant to elect a single article of manufacture                           
               for examination on the merits; Appellant elected the species of bubbles, bubble-making                             
               toys, and bubble bath.  See the response filed December 11, 2002.                                                  
                      The claims on appeal stand or fall together.  See the Appeal Brief, page 3.  We                             
               will focus on claim 5, which is representative.  Claims 1 and 5 read as follows:                                   
                      1.   A combination, comprising:                                                                             
                              an article of manufacture; and a bioluminescent fluorescent protein,                                
               whereby the combination is a novelty item.                                                                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007