Ex Parte YAVATKAR et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                         
                  for publication and isnot binding precedent of the Board.                          


                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                   ____________                                                  
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                   ____________                                                  
                   Ex parte RAJENDRA S. YAVATKAR and JAMES E. TOGA                               
                                   ____________                                                  
                                Appeal No. 2006-0384                                             
                             Application No. 09/041,979                                          
                                   ____________                                                  
                                     ON BRIEF                                                    
                                   ____________                                                  
         Before CRAWFORD, LEVY, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                         
         LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      


                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                               
              This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                             
         rejection of claims 1-33, which are all of the claims pending in                        
         this application.                                                                       

              We REVERSE.                                                                        

                                   BACKGROUND                                                    
              The appellants’ invention relates to ensuring quality of                           
         Service (QOS) for a multimedia call through call associated                             












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007