Ex Parte Larson - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
          publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      


                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
               _________________                                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
               _________________                                                      
                             Ex parte JAMES MICHAEL LARSON                            
           _________________                                                          
                                   Appeal No. 2006-0435                               
                                Application No. 10/028,173                            
                                   _________________                                  
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _________________                                  
          Before CAROFF, OWENS, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                    
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claims 1-5.  Claims 6-17, the other pending claims             
          in appellant’s application, stand withdrawn from consideration by           
          virtue of the imposition of a restriction requirement by the                
          examiner.  Accordingly, only claims 1-5 are before us on appeal.            
                                                                                     
               The appealed claims relate to a method of making a gas                 
          diffusion layer (GDL) for an electrochemical cell which includes            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007