Ex Parte Chung et al - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication                   
                                          and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           


                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                        ____________                                                           
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                           
                                    Ex parte SAE-YOUNG CHUNG and HUI-LING LOU                                                  
                                                        ____________                                                           
                                                   Appeal No.  2006-0439                                                       
                                                 Application No. 09/765,754                                                    
                                                        ____________                                                           
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                           
                  Before THOMAS, BLANKENSHIP, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
                  THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         



                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           

                          Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of                         
                  claims 1 through 15, 17 and 19 through 25, appellants having canceled claim 16 and                           
                  the examiner having allowed independent claim 18.                                                            
                          Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                              
                          1. A method for multilevel coding of a stream of information bits in a                               
                  communication system, the method comprising the steps of:                                                    









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007