The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SAE-YOUNG CHUNG and HUI-LING LOU ____________ Appeal No. 2006-0439 Application No. 09/765,754 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, BLANKENSHIP, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 15, 17 and 19 through 25, appellants having canceled claim 16 and the examiner having allowed independent claim 18. Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below: 1. A method for multilevel coding of a stream of information bits in a communication system, the method comprising the steps of:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007