Ex Parte Markusch et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0441                                                        
          Application No. 09/809,604                                                  

                         carbon atoms, an araliphatic hydrocarbon group               
                         containing from 8 to 15 carbon atoms, or an                  
                         aromatic hydrocarbon group containing from 6 to              
                         about 15 carbon atoms,                                       
                    b)   an isocyanate reactive component comprising one or           
                         more high molecular weight polyether polyols                 
                         having from 2 to 6 hydroxyl groups and a number              
                         average molecular weight of at least 250 to 8,000            
                         and 0 to 10% by weight of a low molecular weight             
                         diol or triol having an equivalent weight of 31 to           
                         99, and                                                      
                    c)   an organometallic catalyst,                                  
               wherein the isocyanate reactive component b) contains no               
               more than 0.1% by weight water prior to reaction with the              
               liquid polyisocyanate a).                                              
               The examiner relies upon the following reference in the                
          rejection of the appealed claims:                                           
          Markusch et al. (Markusch)      6,187,892           Feb. 13, 2001           
               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to a geotextile              
          composite comprising the recited polyurethane composition                   
          impregnated in a geotextile.                                                
               Appealed claims 2, 5-11 and 21 stand rejected under 35                 
          U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Markusch.  Claims 12-14,            
          19-22 and 25-32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being            
          unpatentable over Markusch.  In addition, claims 3, 4, 23 and 24            



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007