Ex Parte Brandolini et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-0466                                                        
          Application No. 10/175,787                                                  

          Andersen et al. (Andersen)    5,506,046           Apr. 09, 1996             
          Jones et al. (Jones)          5,763,336           Jun. 09, 1998             
          Cliff                         6,109,440           Aug. 29, 2000             
                                                                                     
                                     REJECTIONS                                       
               The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                         
          1)   Claims 1 through 7, 9 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as               
               unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Strzelewicz              
               and Jones;                                                             
          2)   Claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the              
               combined disclosures of Strzelewicz, Jones and Andersen;               
          3)   Claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the             
               combined disclosures of Strzelewicz, Jones and Chang;                  
          4)   Claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the             
               combined disclosures of Strzelewicz, Jones and Jillson;                
          5)   Claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the             
               combined disclosures of Strzelewicz, Jones and Cliff; and              
          6)   Claim 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the             
               combined disclosures of Strzelewicz, Jones and Andrusko.               





                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007