Appeal No. 2006-0466 Application No. 10/175,787 CONCLUSION Thus, based on the totality of record, including due consideration of the appellants’ arguments, we determine that the preponderance of evidence weighs most heavily in favor of obviousness within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Accordingly, we affirm the examiner’s decision rejecting the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). TIME PERIOD No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CATHERINE TIMM ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY A. FRANKLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CKP:sld 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007