The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___
Ex parte JOHN ADDINK and KIRK BUHLER
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0516
Application No. 10/344,013
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1-13, which are all
of the pending claims.
THE INVENTION
The appellants claim a microprocessor programmed to apply
irrigation water in an automatically varied cycle amount which, on
watering days, falls between user controllable maximum and non-zero
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007