Ex Parte Addink et al - Page 2



        Appeal No. 2006-0516                                                          
        Application No. 10/344,013                                                    

        minimum thresholds, wherein the thresholds are durations of time.             
        Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                      
            1. A microprocessor programmed to (a) calculate an                        
        accumulated watering need for an irrigation zone, and (b) control             
        irrigation to the zone using an automatically varied frequency of             
        irrigation and an automatically varied cycle amount, wherein the              
        cycle amount on watering days falls between a user controllable               
        maximum threshold, and a user controllable non-zero minimum                   
        threshold, and wherein the user sets both the minimum threshold and           
        the maximum threshold as a duration of time.                                  
                              THE REFERENCES                                          
        Nielsen et al. (Nielsen)          5,251,153          Oct. 5, 1993             
        Oliver                            5,696,671          Dec. 9, 1997             
                              THE REJECTIONS                                          
            The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1, 6-8 and 10-13             
        under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Nielsen, and claims 2-5            
        and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Nielsen in view of                
        Oliver.                                                                       
                                 OPINION                                              




                                   2                                                  











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007