Ex Parte Seksaria et al - Page 4




             Appeal No. 2006-0521                                                                Παγε 4                                      
             Application No. 10/453,147                                                                                                      


                           member, integral attachment mounts (fig. 2) for supporting a                                                      
                           structural member 80. . .[ answer at page 5].                                                                     
             The examiner relies on Novak for teaching an aluminum alloy casting comprised of                                                
             unitary and plurality of cast components.  The examiner concludes:                                                              
                           . . . it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the                                                  
                           art at the time of the invention, as disclosed by Hedderly                                                        
                           (6,517,145), to include an aluminum alloy casting comprised                                                       
                           of a unitary or plurality of cast components, as disclosed by                                                     
                           Novak (WO 00.07867), to case effectively manufacture the                                                          
                           structural parts and their respective assemblies [answer at                                                       
                           pages 5 and 6].                                                                                                   
                    We will not sustain this rejection.  In our opinion, Hedderly does not describe that                                     
             the bulkhead supports the structural member as required by claim 1 from which claims 2                                          
             through 9.  Hedderly describes a instrument panel, steering column support structure                                            
             and cowl structure which are clamshelled together to form a clip 10 which is disposed                                           
             between the A-Pillars 80.  Hedderly teaches that the A-Pillars secure the clambshell clip                                       
             10 laterally (col 4, lines 19 to 22).   The examiner has not directed our attention to any                                      
             teaching in Hedderly that the clam shell structure of Hedderly supports the A-Pillars 80.                                       
                                                                                                                                            
                    In view of the foregoing, we will not sustain the examiner's rejection of claim 1 an                                     
             claims 2 through 9 dependent thereon.                                                                                           
                    The decision of the examiner is reversed.                                                                                




















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007