Appeal No. 2006-0562
Application No. 09/952,588
With respect to dependent claim 57, appellants argue that Notani does not teach
or suggest the controlling as argued and that therefore all of the limitations are not
found in the prior art. As above, we disagree with appellants, and will sustain the
rejection of dependent claim 57.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 39, 40, 45, 55, and
56 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is AFFIRMED, and the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 39-52 and 57 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is AFFIRMED.
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007