Appeal No. 2006-0602 6
Application No. 10/260,600
In light of the foregoing, we will not sustain the examiner’s
rejection of independent claim 1, or of dependent claims 2, 4
through 6, 8 and 9, under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) based on Martin. Thus,
the decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
TERRY J. OWENS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Comment [jvn1]: Type or Paste
Address
Hodgson Russ, LLP
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007