The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEF ALEXANDER HARTL
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0648
Application No. 09/815,181
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CAROFF, McQUADE, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134(a), Josef Alexander Hartl appeals from the final
rejection (mailed July 3, 2003) of claims 1-42, all of the claims pending in the
application.
THE INVENTION
The invention relates to “casino card games, and more specifically, it relates to a
combination wagering game for simultaneously playing several card games”
(specification, page 1). Representative claims 1, 22 and 41 read as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007