Appeal No. 2006-0648 8
Application No. 09/815,181
independent claim 1 as being unpatentable over Malek in view of Aramapakul, the
standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 2 and 19-21 as being
unpatentable over Malek in view of Aramapakul, Gibson and Scarne, the standing 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent claim 41 and dependent claims 3-9, 12-16, 18
and 42 as being unpatentable over Malek in view of Aramapakul, Gibson, Scarne and
Perkins, the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 10, 11 and 17 as
being unpatentable over Malek in view of Aramapakul and Cadaco, or the standing 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent claim 22 and dependent claims 23-40 as being
unpatentable over Malek in view of Aramapakul, Gibson, Scarne, Perkins, Cadaco and
Webb.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-42 is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007