Ex Parte Goldenberg - Page 4


                Appeal No. 2006-0656                                                                                  Page 4                    
                Application No. 10/086,637                                                                                                      

                (Goldenberg, column 2, lines 6-16).  “[D]iscrimination between tumor and non-tumor                                              
                tissue is enhanced” (id., column 1, lines 63-64) by injecting a “contrast or subtraction                                        
                agent radiolabeled with a radioisotope emitting at an energy which is separately                                                
                detectable from the primary antibody label” (id., column 2, lines 19-21) and an                                                 
                “unlabeled second antibody which specifically binds the primary antibody or the labeling                                        
                moiety thereof . . . in an amount sufficient to reduce the circulating level of the primary                                     
                antibody label by at least about 10-85%” (id., lines 49-56).  Finally, Goldenberg teaches                                       
                that “[t]he antibody used as the primary imaging agent . . . may be whole IgG, IgA, IgD,                                        
                IgE, IgM and the like, or a fragment such as, e.g., F(ab’)2, F(ab)2, Fab’, Fab or the like”                                     
                (id., column 6, lines 50-54).                                                                                                   
                         Barbet describes an immunodiagnostic method comprising “intravenous injection                                          
                of a suitable dose of [a] dual specificity conjugate, together with, or followed . . . by,                                      
                injection of [a] radioactive affinity enhancement probe . . . to allow detection of [ ] target                                  
                cells by [an] imaging device” (Barbet, column 8, lines 51-57).  The dual specificity                                            
                conjugate is trivalent (at least), with two or more binding sites specific for antigen(s)                                       
                expressed on the surface of the target cells, plus at least one hapten specific binding                                         
                site (id., column 5, lines 1-12).  The dual specificity conjugate preferably comprises                                          
                “F(ab’)2 fragments of about 100,000 Da, or Fab or Fab’ fragments of about 50,000 Da”                                            
                (id., column 6, lines 32-35), and may be, for example, “an F(ab’)2 recognizing a cell                                           
                membrane target antigen, coupled to an Fab’ recognizing [a] hapten” (id., column 5,                                             
                lines 9-11).  “[T]he affinity enhancement probe comprises at least two hapten groups                                            
                and one or several effector groups” (id., column 4, lines 49-50).  According to Barbet,                                         
                the affinity enhancement probe has a “definite tropism towards cell-bound, as opposed                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007