Ex Parte Wang et al - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                         
                 publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                              



                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                   _____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   _____________                                                        
                                Ex parte JIANJUN WANG and DAVID A. MONDIEK                                              
                                                   _____________                                                        
                                                Appeal No. 2006-0661                                                    
                                             Application No.  10/358,027                                                
                                                  ______________                                                        
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                  _______________                                                       
                 Before  OWENS, BARRY, and NAPPI,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
                 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of                    
                 claims 9, 10 and 12 which constitute all the claims in the application.  For the                       
                 reasons stated infra we affirm the examiner’s rejection of these claims.                               















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007