Ex Parte Wang et al - Page 7



                 Appeal No. 2006-0661                                                                                   
                 Application No. 10/358,027                                                                             

                        For the foregoing reasons, we sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 9,                     
                 10 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                                       
                        Only those arguments actually made by appellants have been considered                           
                 in this decision.  Arguments which appellants could have made but chose not to                         
                 make in the brief or by filing a reply brief have not been considered and are                          
                 deemed waived by appellants (see 37 CFR § 41.37(c)(vii)) Support for this rule                         
                 has been demonstrated by our reviewing court in In re Berger 279 F.3d 975,                             
                 984, 61 USPQ2d 1523, 1528-1529 (Fed. Cir. 2002) wherein the Federal Circuit                            
                 Court stated that because the appellants did not contest the merits of the                             
                 rejections in his brief to the Federal Circuit Court, the issue is waived.  See also                   
                 In re Watts 354 F.3d 1362, 1368, 69 USPQ2d 1453, 1458 (Fed. Cir. 2004).                                





















                                                           7                                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007