Ex Parte 5555478 et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2006-0697                                                                                         
              Reexamination 90/006,402                                                                                     

              amend their claims to obviate or render inapplicable any broader interpretation.  Note that in               
              pertinent part, 35 U.S.C. § 305 states as follows:                                                           
                     In any reexamination proceeding under this chapter, the patent owner will be                          
                     permitted to propose any amendment to his patent and a new claim or claims                            
                     thereto, in order to distinguish the invention as claimed from the prior art cited                    
                     under the provisions of section 301 of this title, or in response to a decision                       
                     adverse to the patentability of a claim of a patent.  No proposed amended or new                      
                     claim enlarging the scope of a claim of the patent will be permitted in a                             
                     reexamination proceeding under this chapter.                                                          
                     At issue is the meaning of “Intelligent Communication Platform (ICP),” “Intelligent Line              
              Module (ILM),” and “Intelligent Routing Card (IRC).”  In that regard, note the following text in             
              the Summary of the Invention section of the specification:                                                   
                     Routing devices strategically placed on this matrix of fiber optic cables shunt                       
                     packeted information to the intended destination throughout the fiber optic cable                     
                     matrix.  These shunting devices are known as shared intelligent communication                         
                     platforms (ICP), intelligent line modules (ILM), and intelligent routing cards                        
                     (IRC).                                                                                                
              Based on the strategic placement disclosed in the specification, it is evident that the ICP is a             
              routing device directly connected to a subscriber station, the ILM is a routing device one level             
              removed from the ICP; and the IRC is a routing device a further level removed from the ICP.                  
              See Figure 1A in the appellant’s specification.  Also, it is evident that these routing devices are          
              characterized as “intelligent” because they make decisions on which way to shunt a data packet               
              based on routing information contained within the data packet being transmitted.  See for                    
              example appellant’s specification in column 4, lines 52-57.  Consequently, to the extent that the            
              appellant’s claims require the ICP, ILM, and/or IRC to determine an appropriate route for a                  


                                                            7                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007