Ex Parte 5253341 et al - Page 24




               Reexamination Control No. 90/005,742                                                                                   
               Patent 5,253,341                                                                                                       

          1            Finally, Dr. Koopman's conclusory testimony will be given weight only to the extent it                         
          2    has support in the documentary evidence.   See Rohm & Haas. v. Co. v. Brotech Corp., 127 F.3d                          
          3    1089, 1092, 44 SPQ2d 1459, 1462 (Fed. Cir. 1997):                                                                      
          4                    While an expert may testify to the ultimate issue in a case without                                    
          5            giving the basis for that opinion, Fed. R. Evid. 704, 705, nothing in the                                      
          6            rules requires a fact finder to accept this conclusion.  InSymbol                                              
          7            Technologies [v. Opticon, Inc., 935 F.2d 1569, 1582, 19 USPQ2d 1241,                                           
          8            1250 (Fed. Cir. 1991)], this court explained the distinction between a                                         
          9            proffer of evidence and the sufficiency of the proffered evidence: "In                                         
         10            short, [the patentee] was permitted to rest its prima facie case on [the]                                      
         11            expert testimony, including charts, that the patents were infringed, and the                                   
         12            District Court was free to accept or reject that evidence."  935 F.2d at                                       
         13            1576.  Nothing in the rules or in our jurisprudence requires the fact finder                                   
         14            to credit the unsupported assertions of an expert witness.                                                     
         15                                                                                                                           
         16    See also In re Wright, 999 F.2d 1557, 1563, 27 USPQ2d 1510, 1514 (Fed. Cir. 1993)("each of                             
         17    these affidavits fails in its purpose because each merely contains unsupported conclusory                              
         18    statements as to the ultimate legal question").                                                                        
         19    K.  The allegations of commercial success                                                                              
         20            A determination of obviousness requires consideration of any objective evidence of                             
         21    nonobviousness.  See In re Huang, 100 F.3d 135, 138, 40 USPQ2d 1685, 1687-88 (Fed. Cir.                                
         22    1996):                                                                                                                 
         23            The ultimate determination as to whether or not an invention is obvious is                                     
         24            a legal conclusion based on underlying factual inquiries including: (1) the                                    
         25            scope and content of the prior art; (2) the level of ordinary skill in the art;                                
         26            (3) the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art; and                                       
         27            (4) objective evidence of nonobviousness. Graham v. John Deere Co.,                                            
         28            383 U.S. 1, 17-18, 148 USPQ 459, 467 (1966).                                                                   
         29                                                                                                                           


                                                            - 24 -                                                                    





Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007