Ex Parte 5253341 et al - Page 89




               Reexamination Control No. 90/005,742                                                                                   
               Patent 5,253,341                                                                                                       

          1    Cohen fails to disclose having the user terminal begin to display the movie before downloading                         
          2    is complete, as required to satisfy step (e) ("said displaying step commences before said step of                      
          3    receiving said compressed or non-compressed response has been completed").  As evidence of                             
          4    obviousness of modifying Cohen so as to operate in the claimed manner, the examiner cites                              
          5    Sugiyama and also refers to Punj, which is not mentioned in the statement of the rejection:                            
          6            Sugiyama et al. disclosed a system for compressing upon transmission to                                        
          7            allow for realtime display of the transmitted video.  It would have been                                       
          8            obvious . . .  to combine the teachings of Cohen and Sugiyama et al.[, a]s                                     
          9            the more efficient coding would reduce the cost of  as taught by Sugiyama                                      
         10            et al. in col. 2, lines 6-22[.]  [F]urther motivation for the combination is                                   
         11            suggested by Punj page 112, col. 1, with the desirability of video on                                          
         12            demand.                                                                                                        
         13                                                                                                                           
         14    3d Action at 92, para. 26; Final Action at 247, para. 26.  While is it fair to characterize Sugiyama                   
         15    as disclosing compression of video upon transmission and real-time display of the transmitted                          
         16    video (e.g., visual telephone data), we are not persuaded that it would have been obvious to                           
         17    modify Cohen in view of Sugiyama so as to provide real-time display of downloaded video                                
         18    information.  The reason is that Cohen has no interest in obtaining real-time display of                               
         19    downloaded video information.  To the contrary, the stated purpose of his invention is to avoid                        
         20    the drawbacks associated with real-time display of such information by downloading it in                               
         21    nonreal-time format for storage and later viewing at a convenient time.  Cohen, col. 1, ll. 39-42.                     
         22    Furthermore, there is no indication in Sugiyama that its encoding technique is capable of                              
         23    providing real-time display of movies, the type of video information being downloaded in                               
         24    Cohen.                                                                                                                 
         25                                                                                                                           
                                                            - 89 -                                                                    





Page:  Previous  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007