Reexamination Control No. 90/005,742
Patent 5,253,341
1 (e) The § 103(a) rejection of claim 103 over Pocock in view of
2 Kirchner is affirmed.
3
4 (f) The § 103(a) rejection of claim 103 over Pocock in view of Dr.
5 Koopman's testimony is affirmed.
6
7 6. Rejections based on Baji
8 (a) The § 102(e) rejection of claims 93, 96, 100, 102, and 104 for
9 anticipation by Baji is affirmed as to all of these claims.
10
11 (b) The § 103(a) rejection of claims 94 and 97 over Baji in view of
12 Catros is affirmed.
13
14 (c) The § 103(a) rejection of claims 94 and 97 over Baji in view of
15 Sugiyama is affirmed.
16
17 (d) The § 103(a) rejection of claim 99 over Baji in view of
18 McCalley is affirmed.
19
20 (e) The § 103(a) rejection of claim 103 over Baji in view of
21 Kirchner is affirmed.
22
23 (f) The § 103(a) rejection of claim 103 over Baji in view of Dr.
24 Koopman's testimony is affirmed.
25
26 7. Rejections based on Cohen
27
28 (a) The § 103(a) rejection of claims 93, 94, 96, 97 over Cohen in
29 view of Sugiyama is reversed.
30
31 (b) The § 103(a) rejection of claims 93, 94, 96, 97 over Cohen in
32 view of Bridges and further in view of Punj is reversed.
33
34 Thus, the sole rejected claim as to which no art rejection has been affirmed is claim 101, which
35 recites “asymmetric” compression and inverse decompression.
36
37
38 V. Extensions of time
39
- 92 -
Page: Previous 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007