Ex Parte 5961072 et al - Page 9



          Appeal No. 2006-0699                                                          
          Application No. 90/005,937                                                    
      1   and                                                                           
      2             A backing plate is secured to the floor of the cabin                
      3             where the tracking is required to run. This plate either            
      4             has locator holes or studs, it can work either way,                 
      5             along its length. The carpet is laid on top of it and               
      6             the photoluminescent tracking (it will have to be a                 
      7             lower profile than the present one) is married up and               
      8             pressed home attaching to the backing plate. Although               
      9             the attachment could work male to female, or female to              
     10             male, we feel that the studs should be on the back plate            
     11             as it would be far easier to  locate.  (column 9, lines             
     12             10-18)(emphasis added).                                             
     13                                                                                 
     14        As used here, “locate” given a broad, reasonable meaning,                
     15   means to physically fix in a position.                                        
     16        Thus, we agree with the appellant that the instant claim                 
     17   requires the sidewalls of the top plastic transmissive layer to               
     18   physically determine the location of the photoluminescent material            
     19   and to physically keep it in its position ( “ . . . a light-                  
     20   transmissive plastic material extending continuously over the                 
     21   elongate photoluminescent strip to protect it and having opposed              
     22   side portions that locate and retain said photoluminescent strip              
     23   forming a channel . . .”)(Claim 27).                                          
     24        The Appellant states that it is not the protective cover of              
     25   Gagne which does any of this function because of the disclosure of            
     26   (1) double sided tape which retains the lighting element and (2)              
     27   the recess sidewalls which locate the lighting element.  We agree             
     28   with this interpretation of Gagne.                                            
     29                                                                                 
                                           9                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007