Ex Parte Petersen - Page 5


             Appeal No. 2006-0704                                                              Page 5               
             Application No. 10/060,697                                                                             

             ordinary skill in the art . . . would have been motivated to include a calcium sulfate                 
             component into the composition of O’Leary et al. with the expected benefit disclosed by                
             Yim et al., i.e. that a calcium sulfate component would add improved handling,                         
             moldability and consistency to the formulation of O’Leary as well as reducing the set up               
             time.”  Id., pages 10-11.                                                                              
                    The examiner acknowledges that O’Leary and Yim do not teach compositions                        
             comprising cancellous bone, but cited Wironen for this limitation.  The examiner                       
             characterizes Wironen as disclosing “a bone paste for the repair of bone defects” and                  
             noted that Wironen                                                                                     
                    states that the composition “may act as a carrier for cortical, cancellous or                   
                    cortical and cancellous bone chips.  Such compositions are useful for                           
                    filling larger bone voids.  In addition, when these bone chips are not                          
                    demineralized, they provide an added spectrum of biological properties                          
                    not exhibited by the gelatin alone or the gelatin plus the osteogenic                           
                    components.”                                                                                    
             Id., page 12.  The examiner concludes that “it would have been obvious to one of                       
             ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to include cancellous bone                
             chips into the composition of O’Leary . . . [because] they fill larger bone voids and                  
             provide an added spectrum of biological properties to the composition.”  Id.                           
                    Appellants argue that those skilled in the art would not have been led to combine               
             Yim and O’Leary as posited by the examiner:                                                            
                    [T]he Yim reference only suggests that a calcium sulfate hemihydrate-                           
                    containing substance (CSHS) provides [improved handling, moldability                            
                    and consistency] when combined with the formulation described in U.S.                           
                    Pat. No. 5,171,579 (see column 2, lines 51-65).  Yim only suggests a                            
                    CSHS provides such advantages in the context of a formulation                                   
                    comprising osteogenic proteins, autogenous blood, and a porous                                  
                    particulate polymer matrix. . . .  There is no suggestion in the Yim                            
                    reference that such improved properties would be expected in any other                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007