Appeal No. 2006-0704 Page 14 Application No. 10/060,697 ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge, concurring. I join with the majority’s decision to affirm the rejection of all claims on appeal under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting. However, for the following reasons, I disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Obviousness is determined in terms of the level of skill of a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made. 35 U.S.C. § 103; Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18, 148 USPQ 459, 467 (1966). “A prima facie case of obviousness is established when the teachings from the prior art itself would appear to have suggested the claimed subject matter to a person of ordinary skill in the art.” In re Bell, 991 F.2d 781, 783, 26 USPQ2d 1529, 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 1051, 189 USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA 1976)). This so called “suggestion test” is not a rigid, inflexible test. To the contrary, the suggestion test is flexible and requires that the evidence be viewed through the lens of a person of ordinary skill in the art6 with consideration of common knowledge and common sense. Dystar Textilfarben GMBH & Co. Deutschland KG v. C.H. Patrick Co., 464 F.3d 1356, 1367, 80 USPQ2d 1641, 1650 (Fed. Cir. 2006). As discussed in more detail below, on this record one need only read the evidence as would a person of ordinary skill in the art. It begins with a teaching in the art of two bone repair compositions that share a common core of ingredients and differ 6 “[T]he level of skill in the art is a prism or lens through which a judge, jury, or the Board views the prior art and the claimed invention. This reference point prevents these factfinders from using their own insight or, worse yet, hindsight, to gauge obviousness.” Okajima v. Bourdeau, 261 F.3d 1350, 1355, 59 USPQ2d 1795, 1797 (Fed. Cir. 2001), citation omitted.Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007