Ex Parte Petersen - Page 30


             Appeal No. 2006-0704                                                            Page 30                
             Application No. 10/060,697                                                                             

             53 to column 3, line 5.  While O’Leary does not characterize the demineralized bone as                 
             having a structural matrix or protein sequestering functionality, in my opinion a person of            
             ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that demineralized bone provides these                      
             functionalities when BMP is introduced into the bone particles and thereby provides a                  
             scaffold, in addition to localizing BMP to the site of injury.                                         
                    This is consistent with what a person of ordinary skill in this art knew and                    
             understood at the time of appellants’ invention.  See, e.g., Sottosanti, column 3, line 65             
             to column 4, line 2, “[t]he graft material is intended to function as a stimulus to bone               
             tissue growth.  It can . . . provide inducers of bone tissue growth, be a scaffolding-type             
             structure that actively or passively attach osteoblasts or provide any combination of                  
             these functions.”  See also Snyders, column 3, lines 61-66, “[a]n object of the invention              
             is manifested in a composition of osteogenic composite materials in combination with                   
             certain classes of biochemical agents having positive bone inductive effects to provide a              
             physiologically enhanced scaffolding for bony healing and body contour restoration.”                   
                    On reflection, the prior art of record teaches that calcium sulfate and                         
             demineralized bone have properties that aid in the healing and development of new                      
             bone.  The prior art of record teaches the use of calcium sulfate or demineralized bone                
             in a composition that comprises hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and a mixing solution.                   
             As discussed above, the evidence of record is consistent with what a person of ordinary                
             skill in the art would have known and understood at the time of appellants’ invention.                 
                    Therefore, when the evidence is considered as a whole, a person of ordinary skill               
             in the art would have found it prima facie obvious at the time of appellants’ claimed                  
             invention to include calcium sulfate in the bone repair composition taught by O’Leary,                 





Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007