Appeal No. 2006-0711
Application No. 10/407,020
evidence weighs most heavily in favor of obviousness within the
meaning of section 103(a). Therefore we affirm the rejection on
appeal.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(2004).
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)) BOARD OF PATENT
THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
TW/rwk
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007