The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte Paul E. Luse, Dieter E. Massa, and Norbert Lewalski-Brechter ____________ Appeal No. 2006-0721 Application No. 10/113,458 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. A patent examiner rejected claims 1-30. The appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We affirm. I. BACKGROUND The invention at issue on appeal concerns "device resource allocation." (Spec., p. 1, l. 4.) In a modular redundant array of independent or inexpensive disks on a motherboard ("MROMB"), MROMB circuitry on a circuit card is used to configure and control an input/output ("I/O") controller independently of a host processor. More specifically, the circuitry allocates predetermined addresses to the I/O controller. Depending upon the addresses that the host processor allocates to other devices,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007