Ex Parte Yu et al - Page 5


              Appeal No. 2006-0732                                                          Page 5                       
              Application No. 10/060,974                                                                                 

                     In this case, the examiner found the specification’s disclosure to be inadequate                    
              because the “claims are drawn to an isolated nucleic acid molecule and the protein                         
              encoded thereby of as yet undetermined function or biological significance. . . . In the                   
              absence of knowledge of the biological significance of this specific nucleic acid of SEQ                   
              ID NO: 1 and encoded protein of SEQ ID NO: 2, there is no immediately obvious                              
              patentable use for the polynucleotide or the encoded protein.”  Examiner’s Answer,                         
              pages 4-5.  With regard to the asserted utility in treating disease, the examiner pointed                  
              out that the specification                                                                                 
                     fails to provide any evidence or sound scientific reasoning that would                              
                     support a conclusion that the instant nucleic acid or encoded protein is                            
                     associated with any diseases or disorder. . . . The instant application also                        
                     fails to demonstrate use of the protein as a marker for any specific disease                        
                     or condition (which would be a real world use).                                                     
              Examiner’s Answer, page 5.                                                                                 
                     Appellants argue that “the presently claimed sequence shares greater than 99%                       
              identity at the amino acid level . . . with a sequence that is present in the leading                      
              scientific repository for biological sequence data (GenBank), which has been annotated                     
              by independent third party scientists wholly unaffiliated with Appellants as Homo                          
              sapiens sodium solute symporter family 5 member 8 protein (SLC5A8).”  Appeal Brief,                        
              page 3.2  Appellants also cite a scientific article as further evidence that the claimed                   
              sequence encodes a sodium transporter.  Id., pages 3-4.3  Appellants argue that the                        
              evidence supports the specification’s assertion that SEQ ID NO:2 is a transporter                          

                                                                                                                         
              2 “Appeal Brief” in this opinion refers to the Amended Appeal Brief filed August 8, 2005.  The pages in the
              Appeal Brief are unnumbered but we have inferred the intended numbering from its Table of Contents.        
              3 Appellants cite Li et al., “SLC5A8, a sodium transporter, is a tumor suppressor gene silenced by         
              methylation in human colon aberrant crypt foci and cancers,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 100, pp.     
              8412-8417 (2003).                                                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007