The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte SUSSAN SANDBERG and BO ANDREASSON __________ Appeal No. 2006-0752 Application No. 10/263,671 ___________ HEARD: APRIL 25, 2006 ___________ Before PAK, OWENS, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. REMAND TO THE EXAMINER A review of the record presently before us leads us to conclude that this case is not in condition for a decision on appeal. Accordingly, we remand this application to the examiner, via the Office of the Director of the involved Technology Center, to consider the following issues and to take action not inconsistent with the views expressed herein. Claims 1 through 5 and 7 through 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Daniel, Jr., Pattilloch, or Bartelloni. With specific regard to Bartelloni, re-evaluation of this reference is in order, as follows.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007