The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SUSSAN SANDBERG and BO ANDREASSON
__________
Appeal No. 2006-0752
Application No. 10/263,671
___________
HEARD: APRIL 25, 2006
___________
Before PAK, OWENS, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
A review of the record presently before us leads us to
conclude that this case is not in condition for a decision on
appeal. Accordingly, we remand this application to the
examiner, via the Office of the Director of the involved
Technology Center, to consider the following issues and to take
action not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.
Claims 1 through 5 and 7 through 22 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Daniel, Jr., Pattilloch, or
Bartelloni.
With specific regard to Bartelloni, re-evaluation of this
reference is in order, as follows.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007