The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte STEVEN L. SCHILLING and EDWARD E. BALL ____________ Appeal No. 2006-0764 Application No. 10/281,733 _____________ ON BRIEF _____________ Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-24. Claims 1, 13, and 18 are representative of the subject matter on appeal, and are set forth below: 1. A process for the production of rigid foams having good insulation properties comprising reacting a) an organic isocyanate with b) an isocyanate reactive compound in the presence ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007