The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEI-YU KO, LI LI,
and GUY T. BLALOCK
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0783
Application No. 10/396,164
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WALTZ, KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims
9 and 11 to 14. Claims 1 to 8, the remaining pending claims in the application, have been
indicated as having allowable subject matter. (Brief, p. 3). We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. ' 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007