The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte RICHARD C. WILSON and PATRICK M. CULPEPPER __________ Appeal No. 2006-0812 Application No. 09/391,294 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before BARRETT, MEDLEY, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final rejection of claims 1-2 and 4-5 of reissue application 09/391,294 of Patent 5,664,376 (08/639,698). Claims 6-23 have been cancelled. Claim 3 does not appear to be rejected, although it is not indicated to be allowable. REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS The appellants have indicated (Brief, page 3) that, for the purposes of this appeal, claims 1-2 and 4 will stand or fall together. Claim 5 is urged to stand separately. Accordingly, we reproduce independent claims 1 and 5 below:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007