Appeal No. 2006-0812 Application No. 09/391,294 facts of each case in light of the overall form of the claim, and the invention as described in the specification and illuminated in the prosecution history.”). In the present case, it is apparent that the preamble goes to the intended use of the support and insulating member in the space between the thin sheet material and the external wall of the building. See Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering- Plough Corp., 320 F.3d 1339, 1345, 65 USPQ2d 1961, 1965 (Fed. Cir. 2003) ("An intended use or purpose usually will not limit the scope of the claim because such statements usually do no more than define a context in which the invention operates."). The preamble of claim 1 describes the corner post of thin sheet material and the space defined by that corner post and the exterior wall of the building, which is the space the claimed support and insulating member will occupy. No part of the preamble, however, is necessary to understanding or defining the claimed support and insulating member. Furthermore, where the building or corner post do appear in the claim body, it is in terms of the member being “adapted for” use with the building. See Loctite Corp. v. Ultraseal, Ltd., 781 F.2d 861, 868, 228 USPQ 90, 94 (Fed. Cir. 1985) ("we interpret 'adapted to remain ... metal surfaces' as merely language of intended use, not a claim limitation"). 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007