Ex Parte 5564803 et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2006-0813                                                                                                  
               Reexamination Control No. 90/006,235                                                                                  
               McLaughlin et al. (McLaughlin) 5,014,875   May 14, 1991                                                               
               Cornett et al. (Cornett)  5,053,758   October 1, 1991                                                                 
               Conner et al. (Conner)  5,175,672   December 29, 1992                                                                 


               Background                                                                                                            
                       The subject matter of the claims is a computerized portable nursing center.                                   
               Generally, the  nursing center is a medical cart including a variety of features helpful to                           
               nurses in performing their duties administering to patients.  The cart includes drawers for                           
               holding patient medications.  Access to some of the drawers is controlled by an onboard                               
               computer.  The nurse enters an access code and patient information using a data entry                                 
               means such as a keyboard or a touch screen.  The computer then unlocks and opens the                                  
               drawer associated with that particular patient.  After the medication is given to the patient,                        
               the drawer is closed and the computer generates a patient record. The nursing center also                             
               includes a transmitter for sending the record to a remote location such as a hospital                                 
               computer for retention.                                                                                               
                       A primary examiner entered eight separate grounds of rejection under 35 U.S.C. §                              
               103(a).  Examiner’s Answer pages 3 to 4.  Each rejection relies on U.S. Patent 5,014,875                              
               to McLaughlin as the  “primary” reference.   The rejection of each of Claims 1-16 also relies                         
               on U.S. Patent 5,175,672 to Connor.  Additional references were applied to teach features                             
               added by certain dependent claims but not described in either McLaughlin or Connor. The                               
               rejection of each of Claims 17-34 patent also relies on U.S. Patent 4,588,237 to Marder and                           
               U.S. Patent 4,894,581 to Roberts in addition to McLaughlin.  Again, additional patents are                            
               relied upon to address dependent claim limitations not disclosed in McLaughlin, Marder or                             
               Roberts.                                                                                                              
                       For reasons which will become clear below, only two limitations in the claims are of                          
               particular significance in this appeal.  Claims 1-16 require that the data entry means be                             
               removable from the cart and contain a transmitter.  Thus, the invention includes within its                           

                                                                 2                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007