Ex Parte Shear - Page 3


                     Appeal No. 2006-0819                                                                        Page 3                         
                     Application No. 09/929,862                                                                                                 

                             carboxylic acid ethyl ester [a CETP inhibitor compound] is disclosed                                               
                             in PCT/IB99/01532 application published as WO 00/17164 on                                                          
                             March 30, 2000 as a CETP inhibitor for the elevation of certain                                                    
                             plasma lipid levels and to lower certain other plasma lipid levels and                                             
                             accordingly to prevent the occurrence of and treat diseases such as                                                
                             lipid abnormalities, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases.                                                  
                             That published application also discloses the combination of a                                                     
                             genus of 4-carboxyamino-2-substituted-1,2,3,4-                                                                     
                             tetrahydroquinolines with a preferred group of 3-hydroxy-3-                                                        
                             methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors being                                                     
                             lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin or                                                 
                             rivastatin.                                                                                                        
                     Id. at 1.                                                                                                                  
                                                               DISCUSSION                                                                       
                             As appellant does not argue the patentability of the claims separately, they                                       
                     stand or fall together, and we focus our analysis on claim 1.                                                              
                             Claims 1, 4, 5 and 8-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                           
                     obvious over the combination of Deninno and Roth                                                                           
                             Deninno is cited for teaching compositions for treating conditions such as                                         
                     atherosclerosis through the administration of a composition that may comprise                                              
                     [2R, 4S]-4-[(3,5-bis-trifluoromethyl-benzyl)-methoxycarbonyl-amino]-2-ethyl-6-                                             
                     trifluoromethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-quinoline-1-carboxylic acid ethyl ester and a HMG-                                          
                     CoA reductase inhibitor, which may be atorvastatin.  See Examiner’s Answer,                                                
                     pages 2-3.  According to the examiner, “[t]he difference between the above and                                             
                     the claimed subject matter lies in that Deninno [ ] only highlights atorvastatin and                                       
                     fails to teach the presently claimed salts and/or hydroxy acid forms thereof.”  Id.                                        
                     at 3.                                                                                                                      
                             The examiner, however, concludes:                                                                                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007