Ex Parte Rode - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written            
                        for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                                     
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                           ____________                                               
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                           ____________                                               
                                      Ex parte JOHN E. RODE                                           
                                           ____________                                               
                                        Appeal No. 2006-0822                                          
                                     Application No. 10/054,253                                       
                                      Technology Center 3600                                          
                                           ____________                                               
                                             ON BRIEF                                                 
                                           ____________                                               
            Before FRANKFORT, BAHR and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                         
            BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                 This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-6, 8, 9,      
            13, 14, 16, 24, 25 and 28-32.  Claims 10-12, 15, 17-23, 26 and 27 have been               
            withdrawn from consideration.  The status of claim 7 is unclear, as explained infra,      
            and should be clarified upon return of this application to the jurisdiction of the        
            primary examiner.  No other claims are pending in the application.                        
            We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                        
                                                  1                                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007