Appeal No. 2006-0822
Application No. 10/054,253
obviousness.” Jones v. Hardy, 727 F.2d 1524, 1529, 220 USPQ 1021, 1025 (Fed.
Cir. 1984). See also In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 794, 215 USPQ 569, 571
(CCPA 1982); In re Pearson, 494 F.2d 1399, 1402, 181 USPQ 641, 644 (CCPA
1974).
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-6, 8, 9, 13, 14,
16, 24, 25 and 28-32 is affirmed as to claims 1-6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 16, 24, 25 and 28
and reversed as to claims 29-32. The rejection of claim 7 set forth in the final
rejection is assumed to have been withdrawn and has not been reviewed as part of
this appeal.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007