The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KAZUYUKI OHNISHI AND HIROYUKI OHGATA ____________ Appeal No. 2006-0885 Application No. 10/168,883 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, WARREN and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal the decision of the Examiner finally rejecting claims 1, 2, 4 to 8 and 14 to 17, all of the pending claims. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §134.1 1 In rendering this decision, we have considered Appellants’ arguments presented in the Brief, filed August 29, 2005.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007