The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BLAKE B. BOGRETT,
ROBERT J. ALLWEIN and LARRY J. WEINSTEIN
____________
Appeal 2006-0899
Application 09/912,290
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 28, 2006
____________
Before KIMLIN, PAK, and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1
through 9. Claims 10 through 18, the other pending claims in the above-
identified application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner
as being directed to a non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant
to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007