Appeal 2006-0899
Application 09/912,290
insulation in order to provide an insulation material
with less weight and increased compressibility…
The Appellants do not dispute this determination made by the Examiner.
See Brief at 9. Rather, the Appellants only argue that the earlier-mentioned
deficiencies in Brandt are not taught by Michelsen. Thus, for the reasons
indicated supra and in the Answer, we affirm the examiner’s decision
rejecting claims 3 and 6 through 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
V. CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner is affirmed.
VI. TIME PERIOD
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
cam
JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
717 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: November 3, 2007